
“You know something is happening here/ But you don’t know what it is /
Do you, Mr. Jones?” – Bob Dylan
Last week, one of my adoring fans wrote a story about me, then sent it to me. He informed me, directly, that this story was not just inspired by me, it was (and is) about me. In other words, I am one of two main characters in the tale. My last name, in real life, is Barrigar, and my credentials are MFA, PhD, which I sometimes use, since I earned them.
This author changed my name, in his tale about me, to Bannister, MFA, PhD.
In the opening scene of this story, I am presented as a drug addict who bursts into a woman’s room, beats her into submission, and steals all her money so he can buy drugs. While I admit to having been forced into borrowing money from a few lovely, generous, and wealthy ladies in the deep past (mostly for food), the scene of physical violence that was (and is) portrayed in this story about me is so far from anything I would ever do in life (or have ever done in life) that its effect upon me, the reader of the tale that is directly about me, was (and remains) disturbing.
(I have never struck anyone in my entire life, even when struck first, although I have had to take a few people out in other ways, like tripping them or throwing them down onto the ground before swooping away like a ghost and disappearing around the corner. The message is, and has always been, Don’t tread on me.)
Next, in this story about me of which I speak, I am portrayed as if I were some sort of Ivy League, bicoastal elite because I spent over twenty years teaching (in various forms) in academia.
But I was a college dropout until I was twenty-five years old. I’ve lived in the Midwest (Michigan, Illinois, and Kansas) for 97% of my life. I attended humble state universities (the University of Illinois, Wichita State University, and the University of Illinois at Chicago). I took out an enormous (and even ungodly) amount of loans to finance my own education. I worked as a pizza delivery driver for a large portion of my twenty-somethings, and was mugged more than once while doing so. At one point I was teaching at three different colleges in the city of Chicago and spent four or more hours, four or five days a week, commuting, by car, train, and feet. And I only stayed in academia so long because I couldn’t find a job that would pay me for writing (even though I also do come from a family of teachers, so a lot of the work felt fairly natural in that sense; and on the other hand, I was often teaching so much to keep my head above water that I had no time for my own writing, postponing my development as a writer without any doubt whatsoever at all).
Finally, in the story about me, I am simplified, distorted, turned into an unrecognizable cartoon villain, and presented entirely as someone I am not, even though it’s obvious that the writer of this tale about me (which, again, he himself directly said is about me in no uncertain terms) has read a lot of my autobiographical writings to write something about me that almost, in just a few places, weirdly resembles who I almost am (but only almost, and only in a very few places).
The story about me is very poorly written and obviously tossed off in a fit of rage and pique after I verbally warred with this person online about the nasty things he was saying about my writing, and also about the writing and art of other people, on the independent literary site I am an editor for. And yes, when the vitriol and hard feelings become intense enough, it is a form of psychological warfare; and I will continue to defend my own work and the work of other artists we choose to publish on this blog until my dying day or until the site closes its doors. I consider it very much a part of the wider war against philistinism and closed-mindedness in this nation and world.
It is a weird thing to know that someone out there hates you so much that he or she is willing to sit there for hours writing a story about you that obviously shows some sort of weird obsession with you even though it also makes its disdain for you as clear as it could possibly be, and then sends it straight to you the next day, even after a cool-down period. (This sort of thing also happened to me a few times back in the old days, when I was a member of writing workshops, etc.)
None of us can understand any of the others of us in this world, not even when we think we do (or especially not when we think we do).
But sometimes, when the writer has done her or his work after long hours (and years, or decades) of patient toil and joyful, painful labor, that writer is able to start producing material that transcends the self, at least some of the time.
Almost no writers ever get to this point, and definitely almost all best-selling writers these days never get to this point. Just cast your eyes over all the best-seller lists these days, and see how all the material is: all the same, all the same, all the same (all the same, with only the names changed). Formulaic writing is not transcendent writing; and one could also say that it’s not even “writing” at all, in the sense I mean here.
After decades of toil, often-unrelenting pressure, danger, and more toil, you finally find your voice in prose. And then someone who doesn’t understand you, or your project, at all, casually happens by and pisses all over it; like a dog trying to mark a territory that was never meant for him at all.
END NOTE: Thank you to Bob Dylan for the song “Ballad of a Thin Man” which gives the epigraph to this (all-too-true) essay. There is nothing new under the sun.
In the title, “thin” means, among other things, of no real substance, insignificant, pointless; Dylan is brilliant at reinventing words (not using them in a sloppy, imprecise way).
END NOTE: The great poet Matthew Arnold first used the term “philistinism” in the nineteenth century, to describe a middle- or upper-class hatred of high culture, which is consequently a hatred of artists and art: due to the love of comfort, possessions, and money, to the exclusion of all else (hello, Mr. El Presidente and billions more).
The Drifter

Hello Drifter
When I was in third grade this boy I knew tried to impress an older girl with an Ant log he knew about on the fringe of his back yard. I guess he’d throw rocks at this fallen bit of rotted cedar tree (for some reason it seemed like a cedar log that had been there for decades) that was home to a thriving colony of Red Ants, and they’d come pouring out by the zillions. This time, the boy, far from genius, jumped on the log and they were on him before he could leap off. He screamed for his mother “like a little girl” his mother said. I saw it happen and at that point I learned to let Ant logs lay.
This is, of course, brilliantly written, Yet I foresee doom in getting to involved with the situation because A.) You are clearly not a stupid boy and B.) It involves me not. Still, you do have strength of character and tremendous resolve and I hope you go on Drifting endlessly, not like Cain, but with success and purpose.
Leila
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Leila
There comes a point when remaining silent involves a lack of respect for the self.
“Turn the other cheek,” of course, does not mean stand there and let them slap you in the face again and again.
And also, there comes a point when the issue is finished and no more remains to be said. I’ve had my say now and the issue is finished and I am already gone.
This is, of course, also written for the many, many other people this sort of thing happens to besides me.
I never really write for now, since I learned that is a useless thing to do many moons ago. My eyes are on the future. If my work doesn’t survive into the future, that is not in my hands either and I won’t be here to know (or care). That is the essence, and the end, of “drifting.”
D
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Leila
Wow that was a great story about the red ant log! And seconded… Drift–Drifter!
CJA
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Drifter
I was taught (perhaps incorrectly) that turning the other cheek provides a target for the other hand. ‘T is all a matter of perspective.
All the best,
LA
LikeLike
Hi Drifter
I don’t know what to say…
I’m flabbergasted that someone would grind such a resentment toward you, Dale.
Certainly an unworthy assessment of your work. I find your stories, essays, poetry, and criticism on society to be the essence of ART. Every time I read your work I walk away enriched. Not to mention your sense of humor, style, and literary knowledge that is a gift to us all. I love the way you write!
Take this piece alone… It enthralls the reader. You want to know because this is conflict. This is STORY.
I admit I have thought about writing you in as a character, too, but it would lean heavily on the heroic side. I scrapped the idea because directly writing about real people, even as much as you like them, can cause unintended confusion, maybe even harm should the prose wanders into fantasy and the creative juices fly off the spinning handle.
Usually resentment is spawned and spurred from a sort of arrow of truth that has hit the heart. Sounds like you hit the bullseye my friend!
Before I go this I found this to be a brilliant and hopeful passage:
“But sometimes, when the writer has done her or his work after long hours (and years, or decades) of patient toil and joyful, painful labor, that writer is able to start producing material that transcends the self, at least some of the time.”
CJA
LikeLike