An Imagined Final Conversation at Polhoegda, near Oslo, 1930 by Michael Bloor

On June 17th 1896, a bizarre encounter occurred in Franz Josef Land, in the Arctic wastes. Fridtjof Nansen (1861-1930), the Norwegian scientist and arctic explorer, met Major Frederick Jackson (1860-1938), the leader of a British arctic expedition. Their meeting was an incredible piece of luck: Nansen and his companion, Johansen, had left their ship, the Fram, more than a year previously to try and reach the pole, and were presumed – by Major Jackson and the general public – to have died. They had, in fact, survived an arctic winter on walrus blubber and polar bear meat, but would surely have perished eventually had it not been for that chance meeting. Nansen later wrote that both gentlemen raised their hats and said ‘How do you do?’ Nansen and Jackson each went on to lead extraordinary lives.

That much is all true, what follows below is an imagined further meeting that never took place.

‘Major, I’m very grateful for your visit. I find myself rather incapacitated, or I would have met you off the ferry.’

‘Professor Dr Nansen, please don’t try to get up. I’m delighted to see you again; I’m only sorry to find you unwell. Jeg ønsker deg en rask utvinning.’

‘Ha, I congratulate you on your accent, Major, and thank you for your good wishes. But there will be no speedy recovery for me: the doctors tell me that my heart is damaged.’

‘I see. Then I would have the doctors say that you have worn-out a heart by tasks that would stretch the capacity of a half a dozen hearts of half a dozen men. I thinking not just of your arctic explorations, but also of your work for the League of Nations: the repatriation of the starving Russian prisoners of war, the ending of the Armenian killings in Turkey, the sending of famine relief to the Ukraine…’

‘Goodness me, if there is any truth in what I have heard of your doings, Major, then your compliment surely fits yourself equally well, or better? You were the oldest officer to command frontline troops in the late war. And, at the supposedly responsible age of sixty-five, you crossed Africa from Mozambique, in the east, to the mouth of the Congo, in the west. I hope you will tell me something of your time with the pygmy people?’

‘They were indeed most interesting. I was especially curious to learn their hunting techniques. But I don’t wish to tire you today. I took the liberty of bringing you a copy of my manuscript, reporting on my journey.’

‘Most kind, Major. I look forward to studying it. But tell me this at least: are the pygmies a fortunate people? more fortunate than we Europeans?’

‘It is difficult for me to generalise, old chap: there are a number of different tribes living in different circumstances. But my understanding is that they live in some fear of their Bantu neighbours, who have encroached on their hunting grounds to practice their horticulture and to graze their cattle. One might compare their situation to that of the desperate straits of the Plains Indians of North America, were it not for the pygmies’ lack of martial ardour. And I’m afraid that I saw a number of instances of pygmy slavery in Bantu villages…’

Jackson faltered and flushed. When he spoke again it was in a different voice: ‘…Forgive me, Nansen old chap, we got to know each other pretty well in those weeks in the arctic, waiting for the return of my supply ship to carry you back to what we call ‘civilisation.’ I counted you a dear friend. So permit me to say that I detect a sadness in your voice and manner that I never knew before. Is it your illness that has begun to erode your spirit? If so, I should say what an old friend has the freedom to say: namely, you should surely have – you are entitled to – the quiet satisfaction of having had a life well lived.’

‘You’re shrewd observer, Major. Since our time together in Franz Josef Land, I have come across a number of British army officers and I’m afraid that very few of them were a match for you in shrewdness. And you are correct to suggest that I am troubled somewhat in spirit. It is not my present physical weakness that is to blame. Say rather that I am worn down by the world we have somehow, surprisingly, unintentionally, created. Would you not agree that, back in 1896 in Franz Josef Land, we counted ourselves masters of our fate: we believed that stern resolve would carry us through to a brighter a future?’ Nansen picked abstractedly at the unravelled edge of his woollen shawl. ‘How wrong we were, Major. You know this: you served in those Flanders killing fields.’

‘I understand, old chap. Stern resolve, as you put it, was only likely to carry you into lethal machine gun fire in Flanders. In 1896, we were quite blind to the horrors that civilisation would have in store for us. But you weren’t dismayed by the slaughter and the inhumanity: I believe you saved, by sheer force of character, hundreds of thousands of lives from starvation, or butchery, or both. Certainly those who awarded you the Nobel Peace Prize thought so.’

‘Thank you, but I was not working alone. And it’s true that I laboured long and hard in the vineyard to bring in some sort of harvest. But what of the future, Major? Will there be another harvest, or is there a blight already on the vine? Do you have any hope at all?’

‘I do, old chap, I do. I should have mentioned this before: last year, Mrs Marguerite Wigan Fisher did me the honour to accept my proposal of marriage.’

Nansen ceased picking at his shawl, smiled and nodded. ‘My hearty congratulations on your wedding, Major. How strange – I believe no-one else of my acquaintance could have given me such an answer.’

Michael Bloor

8 thoughts on “An Imagined Final Conversation at Polhoegda, near Oslo, 1930 by Michael Bloor

  1. mickbloor3's avatar mickbloor3 says:

    Thanks Leila & Dale for publishing this. I wrote it years ago and sent it off to a few places without success. I’m guessing that it maybe didn’t fit as a fiction, because although the conversation never happened, everything else is biographical and historical fact. Anyway, I remained fond of it, so I’m pleased and grateful for it to see the light of day. bw mick

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hello Mick

    This is so authoritative that I imagine many editors looked at it strictly as non-fiction. Therefore it was torpedoed by its own strength. In the “arts” such stupidity thrives due to accidental collisions of ideals and preconceived notions. I think it is a goddam good bit of writing and I am proud to publish it.

    Other Eds (save for Literally Stories UK) are often (but not always) hammerheads; I would not let that get you down.

    Leila

    Liked by 1 person

  3. DWB's avatar DWB says:

    Mick

    That first paragraph is killer good. It sets the scene amazingly well and those details about walrus blubber and polar bear meat are amazing. It should be in a writing textbook about how to select the vivid and important detail.

    The transition to the conversation and the conversation itself come close to matching that first paragraph, which is the best that can be said about them. (They are super-good but that first paragraph is hard to match!)

    As far as other editors passing on this piece, I remember what Philip Larkin said about the critical faculties of most editors. It wasn’t complementary. One wonders what crap they published instead, in the space they could’ve given this hybrid work. But, The Great Gatsby was a commercial and critical flop and failure and Fitzgerald himself also bit the dust as a failure and flop (so-called), so it’s part of the game. Great job holding onto this piece for later. To all: never listen to them when you yourself know it’s good.

    Dale

    Liked by 1 person

    • mickbloor3's avatar mickbloor3 says:

      Thanks Dale, much appreciated.

      You might be interested in how this piece originated. Many years ago, I used to volunteer part-time at the National Trust for Scotland’s Culzean Castle; I was a room steward in The Blue Drawing Room. In the room’s porcelain cabinet there was a small white double figurine of Nansen and Jackson’s accidental meeting in the artic wastes. I used to ask visitors who they thought they couple were. If they confessed to being. baffled, I pointed out that one of the pair was wearing skis. This just increased their bafflement. And then I told the story of their meeting. So you can see, that by the time I got around to writing that first paragraph, I had the story pretty well honed and polished.

      Glad you liked it, I guess this could be case where repetition paid off. bw mick

      Liked by 1 person

    • mickbloor3's avatar mickbloor3 says:

      Thanks for commenting, David. I’m afraid I have a weakness for imagined conversations between historical characters. My favourite is a chat at a picnic in the Elysian Fields between William Morris (my hero) and his contemporary, the 3rd Marquis of Bute (‘the richest man in Europe’). Glad you liked it, mick

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to doughawleyhotmailcom Cancel reply